Listen HERE
Commercial pilot and former air traffic controller Robin Hordon recently discussed questions about the “hijacked 9/11 airliners” on this show. Continuing that discussion, David Chandler of Scientists for 9/11 Truth joins us to promote the Conference on the 9/11 Pentagon Evidence he is organizing:
University Park United Methodist Church (East Fellowship Hall) 2180 S University Blvd, Denver, CO 80210
May 4, 2019 / 9:30 am – 5:00 pm
The presenters at the Conference include David Chandler, Wayne Coste, Ken Jenkins, Warren Stutt, and John Wyndham. All five argue in favor of a large plane impact, presumably American Flight 77, at the Pentagon.
According to this interpretation of the evidence, the 9/11 airliners would have almost certainly been guided by remote control, not by human hijackers; all informed commentators agree that Hani Hanjour, the alleged hijacker-pilot of American 77, could not have flown the bizarrely difficult official trajectory into the Pentagon.
For a summary of the Conference presenters’ argument, watch David Chandler’s 20-part narrated presentation of Wayne Coste’s “Explanation of the Evidence at the Pentagon on 9/11.”
For a very different perspective, listen to Barbara Honegger on my radio show, and read her Toronto Hearings paper “Eyewitnesses for and Evidence of Explosives at the Pentagon.”
The evidence for planes being involved in the destruction of the towers does not come from forensic evidence of the scene, it is assumed from filmed footage. But it is known that the footage is faked.
I don’t have to be a physicist or an architect or a pilot to know that planes would slow down when they hit a building, that they would start to tear apart, that cast-off debris from the plane and the building would immediately and visibly appear. It would be a crash! I know this even though I am not a physicist or architect or pilot. We all know it!
I mentioned Achimspok’s videos in the interview. Here are the links. They establish the consistency of all the video footage from all the different camera locations. This does not argue for video fakery.
UA175 – the last 12 seconds; UA175 – the last 12 seconds – part2; The last 12 seconds of the alleged flight UA175 – refined (Achimspok’s analysis provides a 3-dimensional model of the final approach of UA175 to the South Tower consistent with all of the video footage, a direct measurement of the actual high speed of the plane, and reason to believe it was not being controlled manually.)